Morbidly Fascinating Home Sales Reflect Current Status of Bernal Heights Real Estate



Last week our real estate-obsessed friends at the CurbedSF posted two stories that capture the zeitgeist of Bernal Heights real estate, now that we’re officially the hottest neighborhood this side of Tattooine.

To wit:

1. 228 Ellsworth Street, just sold for $1.6 million. That’s a $900,000 boost in value, nine months and a thorough renovation after the property changed hands last May for $705,000 .

2. 138 Elsie Street, a 2000 sq ft 3BR just sold for $1.69 million, nearly $300K over its asking price.

This would appear to be the new normal. Let the teeth-gnashing begin.

PHOTOS: Top, 228 Ellsworth, Below 138 Elsie, via SFARMLS

About these ads
This entry was posted in Real Estate. Bookmark the permalink.

14 Responses to Morbidly Fascinating Home Sales Reflect Current Status of Bernal Heights Real Estate

  1. Laurie says:

    Sent from my iPhone Laurie Salen

  2. David Kaye says:

    15% of the people in SF make over $300,000 a year. If you’re not making at least $300,000 a year the Powers That Be say something is wrong with you. They keep telling us that hard work is what makes you money, which is why the Mexicans who work in restaurants are so rich that they’re sending all their excess money home.

  3. David, do you have a source for the 15% making over 300K per year. I’ve been looking for a current data set on SF income distribution but have not been able to find anything newer than 2010. Thanks!

    • David Kaye says:

      I regret that I do not. You caught me in one of those rare moments when I can’t back up what I’ve posted. I believe it was on one of the following: KALW news, KQED radio news, or KCBS. A Google news search does not turn up anything at the moment.

  4. I wasn’t trying to catch you…was just looking for reliable data. The latest SF data I saw was from 2012 and had ~12% of households in SF making over 200K.

  5. Richard says:

    Here’s some US census data for 2012:
    Takeaway is that 13.3% of SF households were estimated to take home > $200k in income in 2012. MOE of 0.4%, for what it’s worth.

  6. Thanks Richard, thats helpful.

    David, to your original point, I don’t know who you mean by the “Powers That Be” nor what they are telling people making less than 300K or 200K. But higher salary *is* not just correlated with hard work. It is correlated to education, investment decisions and the industry in which people work, among other variables. On average, lawyers, doctors, basketball players, software engineers make more than restaurant workers (regardless of ethnicity) , the clergy, retail clerks, cab drivers, or non-corporate farmers. Specialization of labor has led to income disparity as certain types of labor are valued more greatly.

    Is your point that people should all be compensated equally, regardless or job? Compensated based on daily exertion? Not trolling, honestly. I’m curious as to how you think we can course correct for income disparity or enabling people to improve their income.

    • David Kaye says:

      Amory, sorry I’m a bit lame at sarcasm since I am not inclined to use it. The Powers That Be are the rich propagandists who claim that they all became rich because of hard work and that this is how the rest of us will get rich. That, of course, is utter nonsense, otherwise the Mexicans among us would be the richest people in our country. Heck, my Mexican housemate has 2 jobs and has just started driving for Uber because he has an extra 4 hours a day free. I have no idea how he can do it.

      I also don’t agree with your assessment that education, investment decisions, and the industries where people work matter much, either. Both Bill Gates and Steve Jobs were college drop-outs. Investment decisions by both of them run contrary to common wisdom — both invested heavily in their own companies and did NOT diversify.

      As for the industries where people work, they’re not what people would suspect. For instance, I know a guy who makes dovetail drawers for cabinets. He began 15 years ago with his brother and now I believe he has 15 or 20 employees. Lots of people make cabinets and drawers, but few are getting rich. So, I don’t believe it’s the industry, either.

      TWO THINGS I believe make people rich: (1) being born rich — Bill Gates is an example. The Forbes family is another. (2) Doing something rich people are willing to pay lots of money for. Examples are my friend Max who makes the dovetail drawers (though it didn’t hurt that he is the scion of rock and roll royalty as well). Another example is the high-flying celebrity chefs. They open restaurants rich people want to go visit. They don’t open corner diners.

      THIRD: There is also a third option, and this applies to Gates, Jobs, Paul McCartney, and Michael Jackson’s estate, and celebrity chefs as well, and probably is one of the most important means to wealth: leveraging yourself. In other words, do something that once you set it up OTHER people who are paid cheaper can run with it. This means writing software or making movies — something hard to create but easy to distribute and charge premiums for, and owning something that pays royalties such as Paul McCartney’s music holdings (he owns most of the Tin Pan Alley music fo the early to mid-1900s, including even the song, “Happy Birthday”). Music can be tough to write, but once you distribute it and collect royalties, you’re set for life. Celebrity chefs often lend their names to restaurants in which they have minimal work or money invested. Wolfgang Puck was notorious for this.

      But hard work? Nawww…

  7. Thanks David. Appreciate the thoughts. Being born rich certainly helps in getting rich but that didn’t work out for me a few decades back. So, I’m going to go back to working hard. Seems to be helping thus far.

    • Buck says:

      There’s aother way. My dear and departed mother always asked me why I didn’t “get married” to a rich woman. I told her I’d try, but that I simply didn’t meet many.

  8. Bernalese, man says:

    Looks like a nice place.

    You know, instead on concentrating on the top of the market, you could concentrate on the bottom of the market.

    • R says:

      Here’s the bottom of the market in Bernal for the last three months – everything that sold for less than $725,000. I have no inside info on any of these.

      421 Nevada (below Tompkins) $470,000
      700 square foot unliveable – essentially a tear down – likely no bank would finance on it – so probably all cash deal sold to a developer

      162 College (at Mission) $650,000
      1200 square foot – looks like maybe a foreclosure, went on MLS and went into contract the same day, then took 3 months to close.

      747 Anderson (below Crescent) $660,000
      992 legal square foot with unwarranted space in attic – “great fixer” – approved plans, probably all cash deal sold to developer

      37 Rutledge (at Brewster) $700,000
      900 legal square feet – definitely an all cash deal – complete tear down – but a large lot

  9. M. says:

    Does anyone know what the exact/official/TRUE boundaries of the Bernal Heights North Slope are ? From what I have seen on some real estate websites, it looks like some lower hillside properties very close to the 101 freeway (to my knowledge, this is the easternmost boundary line) are being listed as in the North Slope. Thank you.

  10. Joe Blow says:

    Had a quick laff over the weekend — the buyers of the property at 138 Elsie were seen leaving the open house for the 4bedroom/2.5bath home at 142 Elsie (went on sale last week). They were clearly depressed (maybe even angry), after seeing the fab layout of the house offered for $1.525M after they’d paid nearly $1.7M for their new pad – with its awkward and less family-friendly floorplan… Oops, buyer’s remorse or neighbor-envy?? We call the pink house at 138 Elsie St. “Gus’ old house” and sorta miss the incredibly friendly orange tabby cat known for biting strangers who dared to pet his underside…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s